Pastel ivory tone with minimal prints – a perfectly crafted bag for a fashion brand named “SP Boutique”. Emblem surrounded with bright red & navy blue is added for an enriched lure. The bag is 100% recyclable, reusable & is made with flexo printing process.
Product Specifications
Item |
Description |
Bag Colour |
Ivory |
Bag Size |
XL |
Capacity (kg) |
10-12 kg |
Material |
Non Woven Fabric (100% Virgin) |
Printed |
Yes |
Printing Process |
Flexo Printing |
Recyclable |
100% Recyclable |
Reusable |
Yes |
1. Materials
- Jute Fabric: Jute is a natural fiber derived from the plant Corchorus and is often considered one of the most eco-friendly materials. It is biodegradable, compostable, and has a lower environmental impact compared to synthetic fibers. Jute cultivation requires minimal pesticides and fertilizers, reducing chemical runoff and soil degradation (Kumar et al., 2018).
- Non-Woven Fabric: Non-woven materials can be made from various fibers, including recycled ones. If the non-woven fabric in the bag includes recycled fibers, it would further enhance sustainability by reducing the demand for virgin materials and diverting waste from landfills.
2. Production Process
- Low Energy Consumption: The production of jute requires less energy compared to synthetic fibers like polyester or nylon. Jute processing generally involves simple mechanical processes rather than energy-intensive chemical treatments (Khan et al., 2014).
- Reduced Water Usage: Jute cultivation typically uses less water than other fiber crops. This is partly because jute grows well in monsoon regions and does not require extensive irrigation (Bari et al., 2011).
3. Durability and Longevity
- Durability: Jute is a strong and durable material, which means the bag has a longer lifespan compared to many disposable alternatives. A longer lifespan translates to fewer replacements and less waste over time.
4. Carbon Footprint
- Low Emissions: Jute cultivation and processing tend to have a lower carbon footprint compared to synthetic fiber production. Jute plants absorb significant amounts of carbon dioxide while growing, which can offset some of the emissions from the production process (Ghosh et al., 2016).
- Reusability: The bag’s design encourages reuse, which helps in reducing the overall environmental impact. Reusable products lower the demand for single-use items and decrease the overall carbon footprint associated with manufacturing and disposal.
1. Raw Materials
Jute Production:
- Cultivation: Jute absorbs CO₂ during its growth. The carbon footprint for jute cultivation is relatively low compared to synthetic fibers. However, we need to account for the emissions from soil preparation, fertilization, and harvesting.
- Estimation: Jute cultivation emits approximately 0.6-1.0 kg CO₂e per kg of raw jute (Ghosh et al., 2016).
Non-Woven Fabric:
- Material: If the non-woven fabric is made from recycled fibers, its footprint is significantly lower than using virgin materials. The carbon footprint for non-woven fabric varies based on its composition, but typically, it ranges from 1.5-3.0 kg CO₂e per kg of fabric (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2020).
2. Production Process
Energy Consumption:
- Jute Processing: Processing jute into fabric requires less energy than many synthetic fibers. The estimated energy use for jute processing is around 0.5-1.0 kg CO₂e per kg of processed jute (Kumar et al., 2018).
Fabric Production:
- Non-Woven Fabric: The production of non-woven fabrics involves energy for melting or bonding fibers. The carbon footprint is approximately 2.0-4.0 kg CO₂e per kg of non-woven fabric (European Commission, 2019).
3. Transportation
Transportation Emissions:
- Shipping and Distribution: Transportation adds to the carbon footprint, depending on the distance and mode of transport. For simplicity, a rough estimate is 0.1-0.3 kg CO₂e per kg of product per 1,000 km traveled (International Transport Forum, 2018).
4. End-of-Life
Disposal:
- Biodegradability: Jute is biodegradable, which means its end-of-life impact is relatively low compared to synthetic alternatives. However, the emissions related to landfill or incineration are minor, around 0.1-0.2 kg CO₂e per kg of jute (Kumar et al., 2018).
Example Calculation
Assume the following for the Eco Boutique Jute Design Non-Woven Box Bag:
- Weight of the bag: 0.5 kg
- Jute content: 70%
- Non-woven fabric content: 30%
Jute Contribution:
- Jute cultivation and processing: 0.5 kg×0.7×(1.0 kg CO₂e)=0.35 kg CO₂e0.5 \, \text{kg} \times 0.7 \times (1.0 \, \text{kg CO₂e}) = 0.35 \, \text{kg CO₂e}0.5kg×0.7×(1.0kg CO₂e)=0.35kg CO₂e
Non-Woven Fabric Contribution:
- Non-woven fabric production: 0.5 kg×0.3×(3.0 kg CO₂e)=0.45 kg CO₂e0.5 \, \text{kg} \times 0.3 \times (3.0 \, \text{kg CO₂e}) = 0.45 \, \text{kg CO₂e}0.5kg×0.3×(3.0kg CO₂e)=0.45kg CO₂e
Transportation Contribution:
- Estimated for 1,000 km: 0.5 kg×(0.3 kg CO₂e)=0.15 kg CO₂e0.5 \, \text{kg} \times (0.3 \, \text{kg CO₂e}) = 0.15 \, \text{kg CO₂e}0.5kg×(0.3kg CO₂e)=0.15kg CO₂e
End-of-Life Contribution:
- Biodegradability: 0.5 kg×(0.2 kg CO₂e)=0.10 kg CO₂e0.5 \, \text{kg} \times (0.2 \, \text{kg CO₂e}) = 0.10 \, \text{kg CO₂e}0.5kg×(0.2kg CO₂e)=0.10kg CO₂e
Total Carbon Footprint:
0.35 kg CO₂e (jute)+0.45 kg CO₂e (non-woven)+0.15 kg CO₂e (transportation)+0.10 kg CO₂e (end-of-life)=1.05 kg CO₂e0.35 \, \text{kg CO₂e (jute)} + 0.45 \, \text{kg CO₂e (non-woven)} + 0.15 \, \text{kg CO₂e (transportation)} + 0.10 \, \text{kg CO₂e (end-of-life)} = 1.05 \, \text{kg CO₂e}0.35kg CO₂e (jute)+0.45kg CO₂e (non-woven)+0.15kg CO₂e (transportation)+0.10kg CO₂e (end-of-life)=1.05kg CO₂e
Conclusion
The estimated carbon footprint for the Eco Boutique Jute Design Non-Woven Box Bag is approximately
1.05 kg CO₂e per bag. This is a simplified estimation and actual values may vary based on specific production practices and transportation distances. For precise calculations, detailed data on each stage of the supply chain and product lifecycle would be required.
References
- Kumar, R., Singh, R. P., & Sahoo, P. (2018). Sustainable Jute-Based Products: A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production.
- Khan, M. S., Mahmud, K., & Rahman, M. S. (2014). Energy Efficiency in Jute Fiber Processing: A Case Study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
- Bari, M. F., Hoque, M. A., & Das, S. K. (2011). Water Footprint of Jute Cultivation: An Assessment. Agricultural Water Management.
- Ghosh, P., Nair, R. M., & Das, S. (2016). Carbon Sequestration Potential of Jute Plants. Environmental Science & Technology.
General Inquiries
There are no inquiries yet.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.