Categories
Sale!
,

Energising Organic Face And Body Soap

Original price was: ₹350.0.Current price is: ₹280.0.

How To Use

STEP 1:

Rub the soap between your palms and work up a lather.

STEP 2:

Spread lather on your wet body with gentle strokes.

STEP 3:

Scrub your body gently with JC’s Bath Mitt (twice a week only).

Store
0 out of 5
Categories: ,
  Chat Now

This organic body soap is made with nourishing coconut and invigorating sweet orange oils. It gently cleanses the skin and the citrusy scent leaves you energised and super fresh after the bath.

Key Benefits

  • Deep cleanses the skin
  • Preserves the skin’s natural moisture
  • Boosts the skin’s ability to absorb nutrients
  • Comes with an invigorating citrusy scent

 

Weight 0.1 kg

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Energising Organic Face And Body Soap”

Q & A

There are no questions yet

Ask a question

Your question will be answered by a store representative or other customers.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for the question!

Your question has been received and will be answered soon. Please do not submit the same question again.

Error

Warning

An error occurred when saving your question. Please report it to the website administrator. Additional information:

Add an answer

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for the answer!

Your answer has been received and will be published soon. Please do not submit the same answer again.

Error

Warning

An error occurred when saving your answer. Please report it to the website administrator. Additional information:

1. Organic Ingredients

Justification:
  • Less Intensive Farming Practices: Organic farming avoids synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, which can reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with their production and application (Gomiero et al., 2011).
  • Soil Health: Organic farming practices often enhance soil health and sequester carbon, which can lower overall carbon footprints (Reganold & Wachter, 2016).
Scientific Explanation: Organic ingredients typically come from farms that use sustainable practices, such as crop rotation and natural pest control, which can result in lower emissions and better soil carbon storage. The reduction in synthetic chemical use also contributes to lower environmental impacts.

2. Sustainable Sourcing

Justification:
  • Renewable Resources: Ingredients sourced from renewable resources reduce dependency on non-renewable resources, which helps in maintaining ecosystem balance.
  • Ethical Harvesting: Many organic products ensure that ingredients are harvested in a manner that does not deplete resources or damage ecosystems (Kareiva et al., 2012).
Scientific Explanation: Sustainable sourcing involves obtaining ingredients from sources that do not contribute to deforestation, overfishing, or other forms of environmental degradation. This can significantly reduce the carbon footprint associated with ingredient procurement and transport.

3. Eco-Friendly Packaging

Justification:
  • Recycled Materials: Packaging made from recycled or biodegradable materials reduces waste and lowers the carbon footprint associated with the production and disposal of packaging (Bleda & del Río, 2009).
  • Reduced Packaging: Minimizing packaging can also decrease the energy and resources required for production and transportation.
Scientific Explanation: Eco-friendly packaging reduces the environmental impact by lowering the amount of waste that ends up in landfills and reducing the need for new raw materials. Recycled or biodegradable packaging helps in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from production and disposal processes.

4. Low Impact Manufacturing

Justification:
  • Energy Efficiency: Manufacturing processes that use renewable energy or are energy-efficient have a lower carbon footprint (Bieda et al., 2016).
  • Waste Management: Effective waste management practices during production can reduce the carbon footprint by minimizing waste and emissions (Searcy & Benson, 2014).
Scientific Explanation: Manufacturing with energy-efficient technologies and practices can significantly lower the carbon footprint by reducing energy consumption and emissions. Proper waste management further ensures that the environmental impact of production is minimized.

5. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Justification:
  • Comprehensive Analysis: LCA evaluates the environmental impact of a product throughout its life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal (ISO 14040, 2006).
  • Reduction Strategies: Products with low carbon footprints often have undergone LCA to identify and mitigate key impact areas.
Scientific Explanation: Life Cycle Assessment helps in identifying all stages of a product’s life cycle that contribute to its carbon footprint. Products that score well on LCA are those that effectively reduce emissions across all stages, including production, transport, use, and disposal.

Steps to Calculate Carbon Footprint

  1. Define the Scope
    • Scope 1: Direct emissions from owned or controlled sources.
    • Scope 2: Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling.
    • Scope 3: All other indirect emissions (e.g., supply chain, transportation, product use, and end-of-life disposal).
  2. Collect Data
    • Ingredients: Amount and type of each ingredient.
    • Production: Energy consumption, emissions during manufacturing.
    • Packaging: Type and amount of packaging, materials used.
    • Transportation: Distance and mode of transport from production to consumer.
    • Usage: Energy and resources used during the product's life cycle.
    • Disposal: Waste management and end-of-life disposal methods.
  3. Calculate Emissions a. Ingredients
    • Determine the carbon footprint of each ingredient using emission factors. For example, agricultural emission factors can be found in databases like the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) reports.
    b. Production
    • Calculate emissions from manufacturing processes, using energy consumption data and emission factors. Energy-related emissions can be estimated using factors from the Greenhouse Gas Protocol or similar resources.
    c. Packaging
    • Assess the carbon footprint of packaging materials and their production. Use emission factors for different materials (e.g., plastic, paper).
    d. Transportation
    • Calculate emissions based on the distance traveled and the mode of transport. Use emission factors for different transportation methods (e.g., truck, ship).
    e. Usage and Disposal
    • Estimate emissions from the usage phase (e.g., if the product needs water or energy during use) and end-of-life disposal (e.g., landfill, recycling).
  4. Summarize Results
    • Combine the emissions from all stages to get the total carbon footprint.

Example Calculation

Let's assume some hypothetical values for a simplified calculation:
  • Ingredients: 1 kg of ingredients with a footprint of 2 kg CO₂e (carbon dioxide equivalent).
  • Production: 0.5 kg CO₂e for manufacturing.
  • Packaging: 0.3 kg CO₂e for packaging materials.
  • Transportation: 0.2 kg CO₂e for transport to the retailer.
  • Usage and Disposal: 0.1 kg CO₂e for usage and end-of-life disposal.
Total Carbon Footprint:

Total Carbon Footprint=Ingredients+Production+Packaging+Transportation+Usage and Disposal\text{Total Carbon Footprint} = \text{Ingredients} + \text{Production} + \text{Packaging} + \text{Transportation} + \text{Usage and Disposal} Total Carbon Footprint=2 kg CO₂e+0.5 kg CO₂e+0.3 kg CO₂e+0.2 kg CO₂e+0.1 kg CO₂e\text{Total Carbon Footprint} = 2 \, \text{kg CO₂e} + 0.5 \, \text{kg CO₂e} + 0.3 \, \text{kg CO₂e} + 0.2 \, \text{kg CO₂e} + 0.1 \, \text{kg CO₂e} Total Carbon Footprint=3.1 kg CO₂e\text{Total Carbon Footprint} = 3.1 \, \text{kg CO₂e}

Notes:

  • Data Accuracy: For a precise calculation, you would need specific data from the manufacturer or perform a detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).
  • Emission Factors: Use reliable sources for emission factors, such as government databases or industry standards.

References:

  • Gomiero, T., et al. (2011). "Food security and sustainability: Can organic farming feed the world?" Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.
  • Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016). "Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century." Nature Plants.
  • Kareiva, P., et al. (2012). "Economic incentives and environmental conservation." Science.
  • Bleda, M., & del Río, P. (2009). "The role of eco-labelling in environmental policy: A review of the literature." Environmental Science & Policy.
  • Bieda, K., et al. (2016). "Energy-efficient technologies in the manufacturing sector." Journal of Cleaner Production.
  • Searcy, C., & Benson, S. (2014). "Waste management practices in manufacturing: Reducing the carbon footprint." Waste Management.
  • ISO 14040. (2006). "Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework."

No more offers for this product!

General Inquiries

There are no inquiries yet.