Kumkumadi Face Wash Saffron & 24K Gold | Deeply Cleanses Skin

1. Natural and Organic Ingredients:
   • Face washes made from natural and organic ingredients typically have a lower environmental impact compared to those with synthetic chemicals. Natural ingredients are often biodegradable and less harmful to ecosystems.
   • Justification: Natural ingredients usually require less energy-intensive processes for extraction and production .
2. Sustainable Sourcing:
   • Ingredients sourced sustainably, such as those from regenerative agriculture or fair trade, help ensure that the environmental impact is minimized.
   • Justification: Sustainable sourcing practices help maintain soil health, reduce deforestation, and support local communities, which collectively lower the carbon footprint .

Packaging

1. Eco-Friendly Packaging:
   • Use of biodegradable, recyclable, or reusable packaging materials helps reduce waste and energy consumption associated with packaging production.
   • Justification: Packaging accounts for a significant portion of the carbon footprint of personal care products. Eco-friendly packaging options like glass, aluminum, or biodegradable plastics have lower environmental impacts .
2. Minimal Packaging:
   • Brands that adopt minimalistic packaging designs reduce the material used and the energy required for production and transportation.
   • Justification: Less packaging means fewer resources used and less waste generated, which contributes to a lower overall carbon footprint .

Production Processes

1. Energy-Efficient Manufacturing:
   • Companies that implement energy-efficient manufacturing processes reduce their overall greenhouse gas emissions.
   • Justification: Energy-efficient production methods, such as using renewable energy sources or optimizing manufacturing processes, can significantly lower the carbon footprint of the product .
2. Local Production:
   • Producing face wash locally reduces transportation emissions and supports local economies.
   • Justification: Shorter supply chains mean fewer emissions from transportation and a lower overall carbon footprint .

Transportation

1. Reduced Transportation Emissions:
   • Sourcing ingredients locally and producing products close to the market reduces the carbon emissions associated with transportation.
   • Justification: Transportation, especially long-distance shipping, is a major contributor to the carbon footprint of consumer products. Reducing transportation distances helps lower these emissions .

Case Study

• Ethique, a brand known for its sustainable practices, produces solid face wash bars that are free from plastic packaging and use natural ingredients. The bars are concentrated, reducing the need for water in production and packaging.
• Justification: Ethique’s face wash bars have a lower carbon footprint due to their minimal packaging, use of sustainable ingredients, and reduced water content, which lowers shipping weight and energy use .

1. Ingredients: Natural and organic
2. Packaging: 100g of plastic (assuming a bottle and cap)
3. Production Energy: 1 kWh per 100 ml of face wash
4. Transportation: 500 km by truck
5. Usage: 100 ml bottle

Step-by-Step Calculation

1. Ingredients

2. Packaging

• For a 100g plastic bottle: $100\text{g}=0.1\text{kg}$
• Carbon footprint: $0.1\text{kg}\times 6\text{kg CO2e/kg}=0.6\text{kg CO2e}$

3. Production Energy

• Carbon footprint of electricity (assuming average global mix): 0.5 kg CO2e per kWh.
• Carbon footprint: $1\text{kWh}\times 0.5\text{kg CO2e/kWh}=0.5\text{kg CO2e}$

4. Transportation

• Average carbon footprint for truck transportation: 0.1 kg CO2e per km per ton.
• For 100g (0.1 kg) of product: $500\text{km}\times 0.1\text{kg CO2e/km/ton}\times 0.1\text{ton}=0.005\text{kg CO2e}$

Total Carbon Footprint

1. Ingredients: 0.5 kg CO2e
2. Packaging: 0.6 kg CO2e
3. Production: 0.5 kg CO2e
4. Transportation: 0.005 kg CO2e

References

1. Source 1
2. Source 2
3. Source 3
4. Source 4
5. Source 5
6. Source 6
7. Source 7
8. Source 8
9. Source 9
10. "Life Cycle Assessment of Plastic Bottles and Their Disposal Options: Case of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE)".
11. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Production and Use of Polyethylene: A Literature Review".
12. "Life Cycle Assessment of Transportation of Goods and Services".
13. "Electricity-specific Emission Factors for Grid Electricity".