Nutritional Information:
No Added Sugar | No Preservative | No Flavour | No Artificial Color | Contain 100% | Finger Millets | Pure Desi Product
Approximate value for 100G
Energy: 365.66K Cal / 100g | Protein: 4.28 g/100g | Carbohydrate: 83.49 g/100g | Dietary Fibre: 4.14 g/ 100g | Fat: 1.62 g/ 100g | Moisture: 9.80 g / 100g | Total Sugar: 0.5 g / 100g | Added Sugar: 0.5g / 100g | Cholestrol : 1.0mg / 100g | Saturated Fatty Acid: 1.09g / 100g | Trans Fatty Acid: 0.1g / 100g
1. Ingredients and Sourcing
Plant-Based Ingredients: The mixes are primarily made from grains, pulses, and spices—all plant-based.
Local Sourcing: Assuming ingredients are sourced locally, reducing transportation emissions.
Emission Factor for Plant-Based Ingredients: Approximately 1.0 kg CO₂e per kg (Poore & Nemecek, 2018).
Calculations:
Emissions from Ingredients:
1.0 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.5 kg = 1.5 kg CO₂e
2. Production Process
Minimal Processing: The mixes involve drying and grinding, which are less energy-intensive processes.
Energy Efficiency: Assuming standard energy use without significant renewable energy input.
Emission Factor for Processing: Approximately 0.5 kg CO₂e per kg (Garnett, 2011).
Calculations:
Emissions from Processing:
0.5 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.5 kg = 0.75 kg CO₂e
3. Packaging
Eco-Friendly Packaging: Assuming recyclable or biodegradable materials are used.
Lightweight Packaging: Reduces emissions during transportation.
Emission Factor for Packaging: Approximately 0.3 kg CO₂e per kg of product weight.
Calculations:
Emissions from Packaging:
0.3 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.7 kg = 0.51 kg CO₂e
4. Transportation
Local Distribution: Short transportation distances assumed.
Optimized Logistics: Efficient delivery methods reduce emissions.
Emission Factor for Transportation: Approximately 0.1 kg CO₂e per kg.
Calculations:
Emissions from Transportation:
0.1 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.7 kg = 0.17 kg CO₂e
Total Estimated Carbon Emissions for the Ready Mix Combo
Total Emissions:
Ingredients: 1.5 kg CO₂e
Processing: 0.75 kg CO₂e
Packaging: 0.51 kg CO₂e
Transportation: 0.17 kg CO₂e
Grand Total: 2.93 kg CO₂e
To provide a more precise comparison, we'll consider specific traditional e-commerce ready mix products commonly available in the market. For this example, let's use:
Traditional Pancake Mixes (e.g., brands like Aunt Jemima or Bisquick)
Instant Cake Mixes (e.g., Betty Crocker or Pillsbury)
Weight: Comparable to the Ready Mix Combo, at 1.7 kg total.
These products often contain animal-based ingredients like milk powder and eggs and may use imported ingredients, leading to higher carbon emissions.
1. Ingredients
Animal-Based Ingredients: Includes milk powder, eggs, and butter substitutes.
Imported Ingredients: Some components may be sourced internationally.
Emission Factor for Ingredients: Approximately 5.0 kg CO₂e per kg (Poore & Nemecek, 2018).
Calculations:
Emissions from Ingredients:
5.0 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.5 kg = 7.5 kg CO₂e
2. Production Process
Energy-Intensive Processing: Processes like pasteurization, spray drying for milk powder, and emulsification.
Emission Factor for Processing: Approximately 1.5 kg CO₂e per kg.
Calculations:
Emissions from Processing:
1.5 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.5 kg = 2.25 kg CO₂e
3. Packaging
Conventional Packaging: Often uses multi-layered packaging with plastic and aluminum, which is hard to recycle.
Emission Factor for Packaging: Approximately 0.5 kg CO₂e per kg.
Calculations:
Emissions from Packaging:
0.5 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.7 kg = 0.85 kg CO₂e
4. Transportation
Long-Distance Shipping: Products and ingredients may be shipped internationally.
Emission Factor for Transportation: Approximately 0.5 kg CO₂e per kg.
Calculations:
Emissions from Transportation:
0.5 kg CO₂e/kg × 1.7 kg = 0.85 kg CO₂e
Total Estimated Carbon Emissions for Traditional Ready Mix Products
Total Emissions:
Ingredients: 7.5 kg CO₂e
Processing: 2.25 kg CO₂e
Packaging: 0.85 kg CO₂e
Transportation: 0.85 kg CO₂e
Grand Total: 11.45 kg CO₂e
Carbon Emissions Reduced by Choosing the Ready Mix Combo
Emissions Reduction:
Traditional Ready Mix Products: 11.45 kg CO₂e
Ready Mix Combo: 2.93 kg CO₂e
Total Reduction: 11.45 kg CO₂e - 2.93 kg CO₂e = 8.52 kg CO₂e
Conclusion
By choosing the Ready Mix Combo, consumers can reduce carbon emissions by approximately 8.52 kg CO₂e per purchase compared to traditional e-commerce ready mix products containing animal-based ingredients and using conventional production methods. This significant reduction is attributed to:
Plant-Based Ingredients: Lower emissions compared to animal-based products.
Local Sourcing: Minimizes transportation emissions for ingredients.
Minimal Processing: Reduces energy consumption during production.
Eco-Friendly Packaging: Decreases emissions associated with packaging materials.
Efficient Distribution: Local and optimized logistics cut down transportation emissions.
Assumptions and Notes
Traditional Ready Mix Products:
Examples Used: Common brands like Aunt Jemima Pancake Mix, Betty Crocker Cake Mix, which often contain animal-based ingredients and may not prioritize sustainable practices.
Product Weight: Assumed to be similar at 1.7 kg for a fair comparison.
Weights Used:
Net Weight (Product Only): 1.5 kg (used for ingredients and processing emissions).
Gross Weight (Including Packaging): 1.7 kg (used for packaging and transportation emissions).
Emission Factors:
Based on average values from reputable scientific studies.
Actual emissions may vary depending on specific products and supply chains.
Calculations:
Rounded to two decimal places for clarity.
Intended to provide an estimation, not exact figures.
Sustainability Remarks Adjusted:
The sustainability aspects previously attributed to Chivda are equally applicable to the Ready Mix Combo, given the plant-based ingredients and potential for local sourcing and eco-friendly practices.
References
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987-992.
Garnett, T. (2011). Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? Food Policy, 36, S23-S32.
Coley, D., Howard, M., & Winter, M. (2009). Local food, food miles and carbon emissions: A comparison of farm shop and mass distribution approaches. Food Policy, 34(2), 150-155.
General Inquiries
There are no inquiries yet.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.